Skip to content

Surveillance and the Recession

February 8, 2009

In the editorial of the latest issue of Surveillance & Society, I speculated that that the global recession would lead to surveillance and security coming up against the demands of capital to flow (i.e. as margins get squeezed, things like complex border controls and expensive monitoring equipment become more obvious costs). This was prompted by news that in the UK, some Local Authorities were laying off staff employed to monitor cameras and leaving their control rooms empty.

However an article in the Boston Globe today says different. The piece in the business section claims that – at least in its area of coverage – the recession is proving to be good business for surveillance firms, especially high tech ones. The reasons are basically that both crime and the costs of dealing with it become comparatively larger in lean periods. The article doesn’t entirely contradict my reasoning: organisations in the USA are also starting to wonder about the costs of human monitoring within the organisation, but instead they are installing automated software monitoring or are outsourcing the monitoring to more sophisticated control rooms provided by security companies elsewhere.

Shouting cameras in the UK (The Register)

Shouting cameras in the UK (The Register)

They also note that human patrols are in some case being replaced (or at least they can be replaced – it’s unclear exactly how much of the article is PR for the companies involved and how much is factual reporting) by ‘video patrols’, i.e.: remote monitoring combined with reassuring (or instructive) disembodied voices from speakers attached to cameras. Now, we’ve seen this before in the UK as part of New Labour’s rather ridiculous ‘Respect Zones’ plan, but the calming voice of authority from a camera, now what famous novel does that sound like? Actually if it’s not Nineteen Eighty-Four, it is also rather reminiscent of the ubiquitous voice of Edgar Friendly in that odd (but actually rather effective) combination of action movie and Philip K. Dickian future, Demolition Man. The point is that this is what Bruce Schneier has called the ‘security show’. It doesn’t provide any real security, merely the impression that there might be.

How long will it be before people – not least criminals – start to get cynical about the disembodied voice of authority? This then has the potential to undermine more general confidence in CCTV and technological solutions to crime and fear of crime, and could end by increasing both.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. February 8, 2009 5:35 pm

    As an analyst who tracks the video surveillance industry, I agree with you that video surveillance spending is being squeezed by the economy. Just this week, the largest IP video surveillance company announced severe reduction in growth – http://ipvideomarket.info/report/axis_video_surveillance_recession. Moreover, continuous reports from across the industry indicate the impact the recession is causing – http://ipvideomarket.info/topics/recession.

    This article is more an anecdote about regional companies than it is a careful survey of the state of the industry. Video surveillance is a $3 Billion USD industry in the US, so a handful of companies doing a $4 – $10 million in revenue does not reflect the general trends.

    Because security is viewed as a cost center, security spending is almost always one of the first areas to be cut – especially capitally intensive security systems.

  2. David permalink
    February 8, 2009 7:49 pm

    Thanks for the insight, John. I always have my suspicions about any article that appears in the business sections of regional newspapers. There is always a slight air of desperation about their attempts to paint an upbeat picture at times like these.

Trackbacks

  1. Chicago: the future of US CCTV? « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society
  2. In the recession, are humans too expensive? « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society
  3. Even video surveillance hit by global recession? « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society
  4. Security and the Economy (again) « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society
  5. Dawn of the Surveillance Dead « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society
  6. What’s Wrong with Video Surveillance? « notes from the ubiquitous surveillance society

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: